Motivation
Progression is a form of projection reasoning that updates an initial state to a future one according to the effects of actions, and determines what holds in the updated state. In single-agent systems, progression has been extensively studied, mainly via the logical formalism of the Situation Calculus and its epistemic variants[1,2].
In multi-agent scenarios, however, precisely characterizing each agent’s mental state requires reasoning about higher-order knowledge and beliefs, such as statements of the form: “I know that he knows …, and I do not know whether she knows …”. A multi-agent progression framework would provide a solid foundation for research in areas including multi-agent epistemic planning, games, strategy synthesis, and protocol synthesis[3,4,5].
Despite its potential, progression in multi-agent systems has not been sufficiently explored. The main obstacle lies in the lack of suitable symbolic representations for an agent’s (higher-order) mental state and the absence of a framework for characterizing changes in higher-order beliefs.
Goals
The goal of this thesis is to investigate existing methods for progression reasoning and to propose a multi-agent extension. More specifically, the work will involve the following steps:
- Review the existing logical foundations and propose necessary revisions.
- Develop a progression approach for multi-agent systems and prove its validity.
- Demonstrate the proposed approach through concrete, illustrative examples.
The thesis is expected to result in a research paper for submission to a relevant conference.
What we expect
We are looking for candidates who:
- Have a strong interest in topics related to reasoning and cognition, including both theoretical and interdisciplinary perspectives.
- Have a solid understanding of logic, ideally with background knowledge in temporal logic or modal logic.
- Have passed at least one of the following courses with a good grade:
- Mathematical logic (MaLo)
- Computability and Complexity (BuK)
- Knowledge Representation (KR)
- The Logic of Knowledge Bases (LKB)
Interested?
If you are interested or have further questions, please contact Qihui Feng(feng@kbsg.rwth-aachen.de). It is highly recommended to enclose your CV & transcript in the contact email.
Reference
-
Lakemeyer G, Levesque H J. A semantic characterization of a useful fragment of the situation calculus with knowledge. Artificial Intelligence, 2011, 175(1): 142-164. ↩︎
-
Liu D, Feng Q. On the progression of belief. Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 322: 103947. ↩︎
-
Bolander T. A gentle introduction to epistemic planning: The DEL approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.02192, 2017. ↩︎
-
Thielscher M. GDL-III: A Description Language for Epistemic General Game Playing. IJCAI, 2017: 1276-1282. ↩︎
-
Aucher G, Maubert B, Pinchinat S. Automata Techniques for Epistemic Protocol Synthesis. ↩︎